Personalised star map for a new baby's birth date, UK
OpenAI API · chat-latest · web search
An exploratory snapshot of Picture the Stars in AI-generated answers
25 September 2026, UK time: API answers 13:44 to 13:57, app observations 13:26 to 14:17
In the apps, logged out, each question asked twice: Picture the Stars was named in 10 of 12 Google AI Overviews, 8 of 12 Perplexity answers and 7 of 12 ChatGPT answers, and was the first brand named in 20 of those 25.
Through three APIs, ten star-map questions asked three times each: 28 of 30 answers from Perplexity's Sonar, 19 of 24 from Anthropic's claude-sonnet-5, and 7 of 30 from OpenAI's chat-latest. That last one is not the ChatGPT app: on the same five questions the API named the brand in 2 of 15 answers, the app in 7 of 10. Across the three APIs no star-map seller was named more often (55 discovery answers; The Night Sky, 46).
The gap is gift questions that do not say “star map”: 0 of 6 in the apps, 1 of 40 through the APIs, although 24 of those 40 answers suggested a star map.
UK shopping intent. UK location requested where supported. API observations, not a representative sample of UK users.
The matrix shows the APIs; the apps are in the next section, counted apart. 164 API answers were archived out of 180 planned calls: Anthropic's third pass stopped after four questions, when that API account ran out of prepaid credit (1 call failed, 15 were not made). Missing and failed calls are shown and never counted as an absence.
Picture the Stars is named in the words of the answer (a link alone does not count). Read one by one, every answer that names it also offers it as an option to buy from.
A separate test, not mixed with the API counts. Six of the questions, chosen before any result, were asked twice in each product, each time in a new conversation of a logged-out, isolated browser session: 36 observations, read and archived with their time, the brands named in order and the links shown.
Observed from a Mac in Asunción, Paraguay, with every question worded for a UK shopper. Google's footer read “United Kingdom / Great Britain - Based on your past activity” in 8 of the 12 Google observations and “Unknown - Can't determine location” in the others; ChatGPT and Perplexity displayed none. A different place, account or history can give different answers.
Gold: Picture the Stars named in the answer. The ordinal is its place among the brands named, an order, not a ranking. Each dot opens its observation.
Choose a question, an engine and a pass. Picture the Stars is marked in gold; other brands the counts recognise are underlined with dots. Each answer shows when it was asked, whether the model searched the web, the pages it cited, and the pages its search returned without citing them.
Personalised star map for a new baby's birth date, UK
OpenAI API · chat-latest · web search
Every website cited in the API answers, most cited first. We downloaded each cited page and looked for Picture the Stars in it. Three different statements, never interchangeable: a page cited in the answer, a page returned as a search source (listed with each answer above), and a page we checked mentions Picture the Stars. A page we could not open is marked not verified, never counted as a page without the brand.
130 websites cited in the 121 answers that cite a page (of 132). A website counts once per answer, however many of its pages the answer cites.
Each starts from something observed and checked, and each aims at a place where the brand is missing, not where it is already named. None is a promise: next month's measurement shows what moved, and a rise after a change is an observation, not a proof. The second is written out in full, ready to publish.
First
What we found
Gift questions that do not say “star map” are where Picture the Stars is missing everywhere: 0 of 6 app answers to “Unique personalised anniversary gift ideas UK”, and 1 of 40 API answers to the five broad gift questions, although 24 of those 40 suggest a star map as a gift.
ChatGPT app0/2Google AI Overview0/2Perplexity app0/2OpenAI API0/3Perplexity API0/3Anthropic API0/2Your blog is read: your star-map articles (“Personalised star maps UK”, “Why star maps look similar”, a how-to on capturing the night sky) are cited in 9 API answers. Your broad gift guides never are: Top Personalized Gift Ideas for Everyone You Care about (December 2024), 6 Good Gifts to Get Your Girlfriend for Any Occasion (October 2024), Personalised Wedding Gift: How to Pick One That Lasts (May 2026, returned five times as a search source for the delivery question, never cited) and Day You Were Born Gifts (June 2025). Nor are your three anniversary articles, all about star maps only (December 2022, June 2024, September 2024).
What the answers to the anniversary question cite instead: The Night Sky's Best Personalized Anniversary Gifts (2026 Guide), in 3 app answers (Perplexity twice, ChatGPT once) and 4 API answers to it (plus 1 to a star-map question); in the Perplexity app it brought The Night Sky's name with it. It is organised by anniversary year, dated (updated March 2026), with a FAQ that opens with “What is the best personalised anniversary gift?”. Other guides cited for this question are also by year or by occasion: Vale Crafted's “wedding anniversary gifts by year” and Max Photo's “best personalised anniversary gift ideas”.
The change
Not one more general list: the page you do not have, an anniversary guide organised by year, at picturethestars.co.uk/blog/personalised-anniversary-gift-ideas/, titled “Personalised Anniversary Gift Ideas by Year (2026 UK Guide)”, dated and kept up to date:
Why first
How we check it
Second, ready to publish
What we found
“Personalised star map for a new baby's birth date, UK” is the star-map question where the brand is weakest on all three APIs, including the two that name it almost everywhere else:
OpenAI API0/3Perplexity API1/3Anthropic API1/2The answers cite pages written for this occasion by other sellers. Your site has a baby shower article (April 2025) but no page for a new baby, while anniversaries have one (/anniversary-star-map/). This question was not part of the app test. Baby pages cited in the API answers:
Read them: , , .
The change
Publish https://picturethestars.co.uk/new-baby-star-map/ on the template of your anniversary page. The exact text:
New Baby Star Map
The sky they were born under. Capture the stars exactly as they appeared at your baby's time and place of birth, calculated using precise astronomical data.
Create Star Map
A new baby star map shows the sky above the place your baby was born, at the date and time they arrived. Enter the hospital or town, the date and the time of birth, add their name and a short message, and preview the map live before you order.
Every map is drawn from a database of millions of stars in ESA's Hipparcos and Gaia catalogues and printed in our Manchester workshop on 285gsm museum grade art cardstock with archival inks. Choose from five sizes, A4 to 60 × 80 cm, framed in black, white, French oak or walnut, or unframed, from £21.99.
It makes a gift from grandparents, godparents and friends for the birth itself, a christening or a first birthday, with free, fully tracked delivery in 1-2 working days.
Keep the blocks already used on /anniversary-star-map/ unchanged: the product collections row, the features (Ultra HD Print, Milky Way+, Award Winning, Museum Grade, Verified Accuracy, Constellations, Premium Framing, Fast Free Shipping), the guarantees and the reviews strip.
Frequently asked questions
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "WebPage",
"@id": "https://picturethestars.co.uk/new-baby-star-map/",
"name": "New Baby Star Map - Night Sky Birth Print | Picture The Stars",
"description": "The sky they were born under. A personalised star map of your baby's time and place of birth, made and printed in Manchester, with free tracked UK delivery.",
"url": "https://picturethestars.co.uk/new-baby-star-map/"
},
{
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Home",
"item": "https://picturethestars.co.uk/"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "New Baby Star Map",
"item": "https://picturethestars.co.uk/new-baby-star-map/"
}
]
},
{
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Is a star map a good new baby gift?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Yes. Rather than something they will outgrow, a star map keeps the moment a child arrived: the stars above the place they were born, at the time they were born. You can personalise it with their name, the date and a short message, and preview the design live before ordering. With free, fully tracked delivery in 1-2 working days, it is quick to send to new parents anywhere in the UK."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Which details should I choose?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Choose the place of birth (the hospital or the town), the date and the time of birth. The sky turns through the night, so the time changes which stars are overhead: if you know it, enter it. If no time is selected we will default this to midnight, because every star map needs a time to be calculated. If you add the time, you can print it alongside the date or show the date alone. For the message, the baby's name with a line such as \"Welcome to the world\" or \"The night you were born\" works well, and you can add the birth weight."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Can I order before the baby is born?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The map is calculated from the date, time and place of birth, so it is made once the baby has arrived. For a baby shower, a gift voucher lets the parents create their map whenever they are ready: the recipient enters the code at checkout."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Which size suits a nursery?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Star maps come in five sizes, from A4 (21 × 29.7 cm) to 60 × 80 cm, framed in a premium wooden frame (black, white, French oak or walnut) or unframed. The smaller sizes sit well on a shelf or a chest of drawers; 50 × 70 cm and 60 × 80 cm make a centrepiece above a cot."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Why Choose Picture the Stars?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Since 2018, Picture the Stars has specialised in creating star maps built on real astronomical data. As our flagship product, star maps have been refined over years of development, customer feedback, and continuous improvement. We've helped over 50,000 customers capture once-in-a-lifetime moments, from proposals and weddings to anniversaries and milestones. Star maps that are both scientifically accurate and beautifully designed. Every order is handled with care, offering free fully tracked delivery, fast dispatch, and optional next-day upgrades. If you need help at any stage, our dedicated team is on hand to assist. And if you're not completely happy with your star map, we offer a money-back guarantee for peace of mind."
}
}
]
}
]
}The FAQ markup is generated from the same text as the visible questions, so the two cannot drift apart.
Links to add
Every product fact comes from your pages
Why second
How we check it
Third
What we found
“Memorial gift idea: a star map of the night someone passed away” is the star-map question OpenAI misses on both surfaces we measured, the ChatGPT app and OpenAI's API:
ChatGPT app0/2Google AI Overview2/2Perplexity app1/2OpenAI API0/3Perplexity API3/3Anthropic API2/2When Perplexity's API names you here, it cites your homepage and your star-map product page; the homepage has one short block that says “Our star and moon maps are the best gifts to remember a passed loved one”; Anthropic names you without citing your site. Your sitemap has no page about remembrance. The memorial pages cited in the API answers belong to other sellers:
Read them: , , , and the app sessions in the section above.
The change
Why third
How we check it
picturethestars.com still serves a full copy of the site. All 7 pages we tested answer 200, each with a canonical to the .co.uk page; its sitemap lists 103 .com addresses; a .com page is cited in 27 API answers (OpenAI 6, Perplexity 17, Anthropic 4); and your Trustpilot profile sends its “Visit website” link there. It is your domain and the answers still name you through it, so this is tidiness rather than visibility: a permanent redirect of every path to the same path on .co.uk. Evidence.
# netlify.toml of the site serving picturethestars.com [[redirects]] from = "https://picturethestars.com/*" to = "https://picturethestars.co.uk/:splat" status = 301 force = true [[redirects]] from = "https://www.picturethestars.com/*" to = "https://picturethestars.co.uk/:splat" status = 301 force = true
Email on the .com domain is not affected: redirects change web pages, not mail records. Check: curl -sI https://picturethestars.com/faq/ answers 301.
Crawlers need no change. Your robots.txt names GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended with Allow: /, and OAI-SearchBot, the crawler behind ChatGPT search, is not named, so it falls under User-agent: * with Allow: /. Being crawled for search results and being used to train a model are separate decisions; GPTBot is the training one. Your llms.txt is already there.
One review figure instead of four. Your About page says 3,500+ Trustpilot reviews, the homepage a 4.8 rating and a 3,749-review strip, the Organization markup 3500 reviews at 4.8, and Trustpilot shows 3,765 at 4.7. The engines quote whichever they read (see below). One count and one rating, kept in one place, and the markup either updated with them or without a rating at all.
Four questions name the brand on purpose (reviews, delivery, accuracy, a comparison). They say nothing about being found, so they are kept out of the counts above; they show what each engine believes. Most of it matches your site. These statements do not, and each one traces back to a page or to no page at all.
“Picture the Stars typically estimates UK delivery at around 3–5 working days after dispatch.”
, answered without searching the web
“Its site advertises Royal Mail Tracked delivery and a 30-day money-back guarantee.”
“Picture The Stars has 5 stars, based on what over 2,731 people have written.”
“The company's site also highlights 3,500+ Trustpilot reviews.”
Perplexity, and , citing your About page
“There is one small inconsistency across their pages: one page mentions Tycho-2 and the Yale catalog in addition to Hipparcos and Gaia.”
The questions. Twenty, written from your public catalogue and occasions and frozen at 13:20 UK time on 25 September, before the first call: ten star-map questions, five broad gift questions, one comparison, and four questions that name the brand. They are not a sample of real search volumes. The frozen panel.
What is counted. Named: the brand is in the words of the answer; a link alone does not count. Recommended: named and offered as an option to buy from, our reading of each of the 55 answers concerned, recorded one by one: all 55 were, so the page shows one measure. The weakest case, Anthropic's second answer to the new-baby question, lists it among “specialist UK star map companies” to consider. Site cited: a citation points to picturethestars.co.uk or picturethestars.com. The same name rules apply to every brand, a name that is also an ordinary phrase (“the night sky”) counts only when written as a name, and range names such as “Original” never count alone. The brands and their domains were taken from the answers themselves. A website counts once per answer. A failed call is an error, never an absence. As a reading check, a looser search for any spelling of the name, in any case, finds 87 answers; the count finds 87.
The apps. 36 observations in ChatGPT, Google Search and Perplexity, logged out, in an isolated browser session, from Asunción, Paraguay, recorded by a separate observer with the same rule: only brands named in the text of the answer count. Google's Gemini API with Google Search grounding was left out on purpose: its terms forbid analysing grounded results, so Google is observed in the product only.
The pages. Every cited page was downloaded on 25 September and searched for the brand names. Pages that refused a plain download were opened in a real browser where possible; the rest stay marked not verified. Every check, with the text we read.
The code. The page and the tests call the same counting functions. 50 of 50 tests pass, in 4 files, including negative controls (a generic phrase, a name inside a link, a lookalike domain, a failed call, a reservation that would cross the cap).
| API | Answers | Searched | Failed | Spent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI API · chat-latest · web searchResponses API, web_search tool, tool choice auto, at most 4 tool calls and 3,000 output tokens, no system instructionsModel returned: chat-latest. UK location requested (web_search user_location, country GB). | 60 | 49 | 0 | $3.14 |
| Perplexity Sonar via OpenRouter · perplexity/sonar · location not setOpenRouter chat completions, provider search defaults, at most 3,000 output tokens, no system promptModel returned: perplexity/sonar. Location not set: OpenRouter does not document user_location for web_search_options. | 60 | 60 | 0 | $0.33 |
| Anthropic API · claude-sonnet-5 · web searchMessages API, web_search_20250305 (direct search), at most 3 searches and 4,000 output tokens, no system prompt, automatic prompt caching (cost only)Model returned: claude-sonnet-5. UK location requested (web_search user_location, country GB). | 44 | 41 | 1 | $3.34 |
The spending cap. $10.00 for everything, tests included. Before each request, its maximum cost (from the output-token and search limits, and an input ceiling) was reserved in a file; a request that could push the total over the cap was refused, and a request costing more than its reservation would have stopped the collection. Spent: $6.81, including 6 calibration calls (6 archived, not counted). Anthropic's account ran out of prepaid credit before our cap was reached. Every reservation, the collection log.
Prices used: OpenAI chat-latest $5 and $30 per million tokens in and out, plus $10 per 1,000 searches; Anthropic claude-sonnet-5 $2 and $10, plus $10 per 1,000 searches; Perplexity through OpenRouter, the cost OpenRouter reported for each call. Checked on the providers' pages on 2026-09-25.
What this is not. Not a market share, not the share of UK shoppers who see the brand, not a ranking of preference: the order of names in an answer is an order. Answers vary from one session to the next, which is why every cell shows each pass.